---

Dear Editor,
I wondered how the political ads for Janet Protasiewicz candidacy for Wisconsin Supreme Court were as many as 10 to 1 more than Daniel Kelly's ads.
How could the Democrat party finally out-fund the Republican candidate 10 to 1?
Then I saw a report on the internet where billionaire Hungarian George Soros was funding liberal candidates at the tune of 40 million dollars. This doesn't sound like a government for the people, by the people and of the people; a statement Abraham Lincoln championed.
Janet has already violated judicial ethics in her ads by stating her position on a controversial issue, so what standard would she honor if she were on the Wisconsin Supreme Court?
Marv Winch
Dodgeville, WI